2/1/2024 0 Comments Traded that for semaphor![]() Imagine a set of waiting threads, lined up in a queue – much like a lineup in front of a busy nightclub or theatre. You should be able to drop any of these primitives into almost any existing C++11 project. Since the standard C++11 library does not include semaphores, I’ve also provided a portable Semaphore class that maps directly to native semaphores on Windows, MacOS, iOS, Linux and other POSIX environments. You’ll find all of the C++11 source code on GitHub. They’re lightweight, in the sense that some operations happen entirely in userspace, and they can (optionally) spin for a short period before sleeping in the kernel. Not only that, but these implementations share some desirable properties. A Lightweight Semaphore With Partial Spinning. ![]() Another Solution to the Dining Philosophers Problem.My opinion changed once I realized that, using only semaphores and atomic operations, it’s possible to implement all of the following primitives: I knew that a semaphore could keep track of available units of a resource, or function as a clunky kind of mutex, but that seemed to be about it. They were invented by Edsger Dijkstra back in the early 1960s, before anyone had done much multithreaded programming, or much programming at all, for that matter. I used to think semaphores were strange and old-fashioned. One way to make threads wait – and put them to sleep inside the kernel, so that they no longer take any CPU time – is with a semaphore. They must wait when there’s no work available. They must wait for exclusive access to a resource. In multithreaded programming, it’s important to make threads wait.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |